Welcome to Our Community

Some features disabled for guests. Register Today.

z limit trips from g54 to g55

Discussion in 'CNC Mills/Routers' started by Steve mehrlich, Aug 20, 2021.

  1. Steve mehrlich

    Builder

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2020
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    23
    morning,


    or afternoon depending on where you are.

    i am trying to machine two identical parts on a chinese knockoff using blackbox control from fusion 360.

    modelled the component and then applied another instance of it in setup. g code looks good but when machines moving from what it has finished in g54 on to g55 it trips the z limit switch.

    what am i doing wrong?

    cheers

    steve
     
  2. sharmstr

    sharmstr OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2018
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    1,448
  3. Steve mehrlich

    Builder

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2020
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    23
    Sharmstr

    Did the x and y but not the z, imbecile!

    Reckon that's it?

    Cheers for the reply
     
    sharmstr and Alex Chambers like this.
  4. sharmstr

    sharmstr OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2018
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    1,448
    Depending on your setup, it may be easier to use the patterning function in Fusion instead.
     
    David the swarfer likes this.
  5. Steve mehrlich

    Builder

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2020
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    23
    i gave that a go a while ago and it blew my mind slightly. would patterning still use a g55 or would two separate bits of stock have to be placed accurately on the spoil board? im shaping some chopping boards from supplied stock that is only 4mm bigger that the finished article so set up has to be pretty spot on.
    because you seem to know what you're talking about , on the same job with my now z probed for g55, the probing function threw a wobble on the g55 this afternoon. same process for g54 is fine but g55 gave me an odd z height. any simple reason for that?
     
  6. Steve mehrlich

    Builder

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2020
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    23
    when did editing other peoples posts become a thing?
     
  7. sharmstr

    sharmstr OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2018
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    1,448
    No, patterning doesnt use G55 unless you tell it to. I think what you are really asking is if patterning uses multiple work offsets for the same cuts in different locations. No it doesnt. That's the point. Well, at lease one of the points. :)

    You give it a distance (dimensional offset) when you set it up in Fusion. I like using it for production when I either have a ton of extra stock and I can wing it or when I have a fixture. If its something you're going to be doing a lot of, look into a simple locating fixture and set it up for a higher G5x number that you'll never need for anything else. Then you can screw around with G54 all you want and when its time to do that job again, set up/install your fixture, home your machine and go. No need to re probe since grbl saves your offset info.

    Assuming you're using OB Control. I cant remember off the top of my head if it supports probing different work coordinates. If your stock thickness is the same then you dont need to re probe it. Just probe it in G54, take note of your current Z value, switch to G55, put the Z value into the dro and instead of pressing enter, hold the shift down then press enter to set it. Actually the stock doesnt even need to be the same thickness. Just figure out the difference and set it in the DRO.


    I dont see that your post was edited.
     
  8. Giarc

    Giarc OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    3,016
    Likes Received:
    1,682
    Me either.
     
  9. Steve mehrlich

    Builder

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2020
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    23
    Sharmstr

    Thanks again for your reply, that has made a lot of sense and I reckon will help In the future.
    Apologies for the machine faux Pas , I'll be sure not to mention it in future post's.

    Thanks for your help
     
    sharmstr likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice