Welcome to Our Community

Some features disabled for guests. Register Today.

C-Beam™ Machine - Plate Maker

Discussion in 'CNC Mills/Routers' started by Mark Carew, Jul 16, 2015.

  1. Peter Van Der Walt

    Peter Van Der Walt OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    15,113
    Likes Received:
    4,327
    Checkout Lasers - OpenBuilds Part Store for our recommendations.

    A diode laser cannot cut metal though - that needs hundreds of watts more power, and also fiber (not diode) tech
     
  2. Bruce Fenstermacher

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    6 years since I built my C-Beam, back when this thread first started 55 pages ago. I've done a few minor modifications to it but most of the machine including the Z height has remained the same as originally introduced. I have the standard waste board set up of 2 layers of 3/4" MDF board. Most every cut is made on a 3rd 3/4" MDF waste board clamped to the first 2. I may make a few cuts then remove that waste board and save it for the next time I want to repeat the job and then I reinstall it and run more cuts. The issue is clearance under the Z beam of only about 5/8". Not much room for the clamps to hold the actual material (.032 sheet aluminum) being cut. I need more Z clearance. If I could find 1/2" MDF I could use that and gain back 3/4 of an inch but 1/2" MDF is not available that I can find. I'd like to raise the Z height 2" by replacing the Y V-slot side columns which are 10" with 12" pieces. I will then extend my router mount lower in the holder, currently it is set at about 1/3 of the router and it would end up about in the middle. I realize both these mods might effect rigidity of the machine. But I wonder if it would even be noticed. Has anyone done this before and how did it work out. Cam you point me to some fo these modes on this forum so I can see how they were accomplished. Thanks
     
  3. Stwspoon

    Stwspoon New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2018
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    9
    I raised my x axis by 20 mm with the stock hw by putting the bottoms of the vertical 20x60s on top of the rear bottom crossbar instead of behind it. See my earlier posts. It seemed sturdy but I had electrical gremlins due to cheap knockoff “Toshiba” drivers. I since have done other mods to lower the table and make the zaxis more rigid.
    Then life intervened ….
    I have only recently been able to work on it again.
     
  4. Bruce Fenstermacher

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    I see how you might have done that Stwspoon. Thanks for the idea, I like it. There is 20mm under the z column I can get.
    Attached is a picture of how my router is currently clamped. I'd like to move it down in the holder say 20mm but of course that won't do anything for rigidity. Or will it make a difference? Where on on the router are most people clamping the router and how high on the router can you get away with? Thanks

    Bruce
     

    Attached Files:

  5. David the swarfer

    David the swarfer OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,475
    Likes Received:
    1,920
    if you want rigidity then I believe you need 2 clamps holding that router.
    I ran mine for a while with a single clamp (holding a Dremel) and could easily detect flex there.
    When I replaced the Dremel with a Makita I made 2 clamps and it is much stiffer.
     
  6. Peter Van Der Walt

    Peter Van Der Walt OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    15,113
    Likes Received:
    4,327
    Or a set of Black Corner Connectors underneath or on top. I run a single on my Minimill and machine steel occationally.
     
  7. Bruce Fenstermacher

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Not seen in the photo, my current router clamp, is that there are 4 black corner connectors holding it, 2 on the top and 2 on the bottom. Would 2 clamps make it more rigid?
     
  8. David the swarfer

    David the swarfer OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,475
    Likes Received:
    1,920
    Yes, I believe so, since the clamp itself can flex (everything flexes, I can measure flex in my cast iron lathe with just fingertip pressure, 1950's British iron, not a wet noodle from the bargain bin :)
     
  9. Bruce Fenstermacher

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Yes my 50's era Atlas 10" has flex, I understand. I should have phrased my question better. Considering the rest of my C-Beam is basically stock, would it be necessary to add another clamp to eliminate flex caused by extending the router down an inch. Or would adding a second clamp be one thinin a list of thins that could be done to tighten up the C-Beam?
    I'm not asking for an absolute answer, just an opinion from folks who might have already gone there. The only why I'll really know is to try it and see if I notice any ill effects.
    Thanks
     
  10. Rick 2.0

    Rick 2.0 OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    2,896
    Likes Received:
    1,555
    Honestly, if I was looking to stiffen a C-Beam Machine, the first thing I would do is replace the Z gantry plate with an XL gantry plate due to the substantially wider grip it provides on the Z-axis rail. I'd also replace the X-axis gantry plate at the same time. While the XL gantry plate is only about an inch and a half wider, the thicker plate offers a stiffness upgrade on the original 3mm plate. The original C-Beam design predates the XL Gantry plate and it's a beneficial update that should have been made years ago.

    As for the second mount bracket adding stiffness, yes and no. It all comes down to how much you tighten the bracket to the router. The main reason I like the second mount is the ease in which you can drop in the router and not have to worry about it being stable or square to the work surface. You drop it in, snug it up and you know it's good. I use the center and bottom rows of holes on the XL gantry plate. I don't even mess with the black angle corner connectors. (Note, you will have to drill out the two threaded holes on the bottom row of the plate to get full attachment.) This is one of those upgrades that once you've done it, you'll wonder why you didn't do it years ago.
     
  11. Roni137

    Roni137 New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2024
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was wondering if there was a way to recover old log files. Specifically, the information output into the log/serial terminal tab?
     
  12. Peter Van Der Walt

    Peter Van Der Walt OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    15,113
    Likes Received:
    4,327
    Not stored anywhere no. Its just relevant to whats going on at the moment after all. Why would you need it? If you provide more details we might come up with some other solution to help with the issue at hand?
     
  13. Bruce Fenstermacher

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Well it's now been 10 years since I built my C-Beam. It's still pretty stock though there have been a few mods made. At the time there was videos showing exactly every piece of the puzzle. A C-Beam kit, controller board, power supply and for software we used Sketchup and an extension to Sketchup called SketchUcam, a Gcode plotter to show you cut paths and a few other extensions from Phlatboyz. We sent the Gcode to the C-Beam with GrblPanel. I'm still using all this software. I'm sure I'm stuck in time.
    About every month, maybe even more often, I get notices from Open Builds and I've occasionally considered an upgrade to a newer style router. But to tell the truth I will never seriously consider it because I have yet to find complete instructions and or examples that lay out all the new stuff and how to use it to create a working machine.

    Where are the complete, and I mean complete, list of products from the machine kit, router, controller, controller software to run it and design software. How is the Gcode created.
    Where are the latest how threads, instructions and videos? Have I missed them someplace?
     
    Mark Carew and David the swarfer like this.
  14. Mark Carew

    Mark Carew OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,759
    Likes Received:
    2,443
    Hi Bruce,
    Thanks for reaching out and for your support and feedback
    I still love using SketchUp! :) I know for the more advanced stuff we need to use the advanced options and that's fine but the magic of SketchUp for me replaces that jot down a quick idea even if later you move it to the other software, it's still the quickest and best way to do it with the craziest part being that it was never even made for this :D

    As for the new style of machining we have been kind of hooked on the Vectric stuff for a while now because it can do pretty much all you need in there.
    you can either export a DXF from SketchUp and bring it into Vectric to work up tool paths or you can create the whole project right in Vectric with the vector toiling and 3D model importing they have now. They have a few of versions of the software, but I like the VCarve Desktop, you can do the compare between the software on their site

    So picture, your making a sign for your Dad who loves to fish, you can work up the size and outside shape of the sign and then drag some cool 3D fish or boat 3D reliefs models or even 3D STL models that you found off a 3D printing site. It's really pretty cool and powerful software

    [​IMG]

    As for the machines you can see we have machines like the LEAD 1515 they do have all the step by step video tutorials part way down the page
    they are located under the main Build video so maybe we should find a better way to showcase these to make them easier to recognize
    upload_2024-12-2_18-41-10.png

    In these videos we show, in true OpenBuilds fashion, all the way though the build process to electronics and software.

    As for the example after the build, we use a simple "Hello World" example in the OpenBuilds CAM software to get you started but in reality, you will soon want to use more advanced CAM software like I mentioned above like VCarve Desktop or CarveCo, etc. They all let you output gcode in grbl or OpenBuilds.

    As for controllers, BlackBox is the goto as it's just a great bullet proof controller and we use it on most all of the machines, It's become a part of the system.

    Bruce, I hope once you take a look over the videos and get a better feel for the machines and the software flow you will feel better about looking into a future machine.

    Thank you again for your help and allow us to see, in a better light a path forward that we can use to help others enjoy this awesome CNC hobby

    All the best
    Mark C
     
  15. evilc66

    evilc66 Journeyman
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    154
    Not really. Everything you are using today is still valid. That's one of the beautiful (and frustrating) aspects of this hobby and these machines; you can set them up and use them as you see fit.

    If you want an almost one stop shop, then Openbuilds has what you need. They can provide everything but the CAD software. For the hardware, they offer everything for a turnkey machine, including controllers, interfaces, and spindles. For software, they have pre compiled firmware for the controllers (grbl based), and the controlling software (Openbuilds Control). To make the gcode, the have cam.openbuilds.com, which will generate gcode for a whole host of machines, from a whole host of file formats (but not 3D files).

    I've had a C-Beam Machine for about as long as you have. I swear, I upgrade the thing more than I use it. I did many of the mods that were mentioned in the post above, and are valid mods, but I'm currently working on converting to linear rails on all axes. I was getting tired of the need to clean and adjust the wheels. Also, the router we have at work of which I used to make the plates for the conversion) uses linear rails, and they are butter smooth.

    And I'm not the only one making mods. I doubt there are very few stock machines out there in the wild. You just may not see all of them on this forum (I'm not very active on forums any more)
     
    Mark Carew likes this.
  16. Bruce Fenstermacher

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Mark and evili66, thanks for your replies. When we started way back Open Builds was the first place I saw a total solution ie we were told if you buy A, B, C, and D, and put them together as you see in our video, Then download F, G, H and you can draw your design, create G-code and send it to the controller as you can see in our video, and make your part. Back then if your hobby was figuring out how to assemble parts and software to build a tool, there were many more options I'm sure. But if you wanted to collect parts and software and be almost assured success because building a machine was not your intended hobby, Open Builds gave and sold the solution. Open Builds and C-Beam, I think was a break through.

    Now it seems there are lots more choices and there is a library of millions of pages of threads to read and figure out how we got to where we are today. But that is way to hard just to figure out what a sure path might be to the best solution using todays hardware and software. I did not watch any Lead 1515 videos so I wouldn't know the same tutorials existed as those the C-Beam had. How would I. My C-Bead and it's build was not because I wanted a new hobby, I wanted a new tool that would enhance a number of hobbies I already have. The C-Beam has and the old setup has done that. It's a tool and I don't sit and fiddle with it.

    I will watch the Lead 1515 videos maybe it will answer some questions, maybe generate more.

    The question I have now is, is there a reason I would want to upgrade from the Sparks Concept xPRo to a Black Box?

    Thanks

    Bruce
     
    Mark Carew likes this.
  17. Peter Van Der Walt

    Peter Van Der Walt OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    15,113
    Likes Received:
    4,327
    Not quite, all our machines are still based off our modular parts catalog, all our machines has for the last 6-7 years been running on our BlackBox 4X and later BlackBox X32 controllers, all the time running CONTROL, and the same grbl/grblHAL compatible CAMs its always been. Software workflows has been solid for years

    Might want to just review the documentation? Start with docs:software:overview [OpenBuilds Documentation] - forum is for discussion, documentation is summarised and concise

    • Future proofing, older stuff gets phased out - xpro stuff was running grbl 1.1 which dates back to 2016 (getting long in the tooth, missing newer features)
    • Stronger stepper drivers
    • VFD support, coolant control, etc baked in
    • grblHAL firmware (32 bit, way more powerful, faster, better, current and continually updated, lots of plugins)
    • Supports Wifi
    • Supports OpenBuilds Interface (don't even need a computer anymore!)
    • Plug and play with all our other electronics
    • Up-to-date support entitlements (not always able to get vendor support for out of date stuff anymore)
    • Up-to-date software toolchains
    Still the same ethos. Kit machines - ready to go all you need, awesome long format videos for assembly, detailed documentation for wiring, easy to use software, machine profiles for settings, etc
    Even for Custom machines, we offer an electronics bundle with the same workflows, same software etc too.

    More Docs to refer to
    BlackBox X32 docs:blackbox-x32:start [OpenBuilds Documentation]
    Interface docs:interface:start [OpenBuilds Documentation]
    Documentation Start page / Index: start [OpenBuilds Documentation]
     
  18. Bruce Fenstermacher

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ok so I've looked at a few videos. I tried using the free online SketchUp to create a test project to bring into OpenBuilds Cam to add tool paths and generate g-code. I was unsuccessful. Seems you must have a subscription to SketchUp in order to export in a file format that can be opened by OB Cam. OK I've yet to have to pay for SketchUp but I've stuck using my PC and the 2017 version when I prefer my Mac. So I opened the Hello World test file and deleted the tool paths then got frustrated trying to create tool paths. I don't think in metric, read the OB Cam documents and can't see how I can change that. Then while I was poking around and reading I think I read OB Cam is for use with the Black Box controller. Well I don't have that. Maybe this is not true and maybe there is a way to select Imperial rather than metric for measure.

    It seems to be coming clear. Unless I get a Black Box for my C-Beam I'm stuck using all the old software I've been using. Do I have this wrong?

    Also, as a forum moderator myself, I've sensitive to sticking somewhat to the subject of the thread. I'm wondering if there might be a better thread to read and post my questions about the 'new stuff" and how I might move a little bit past 2017 with my C-Beam. Is there a better forum or thread to post my questions.

    Thanks.

    Bruce
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice