Welcome to Our Community

Some features disabled for guests. Register Today.

Sign Up

Moag's CNC Mill

Discussion in 'CNC Mills/Routers' started by Moag, May 9, 2016.

Moag's CNC Mill

Moag's CNC Mill

Discussion in 'CNC Mills/Routers' started by Moag, May 9, 2016.

A design in progress, to 3D carve two-part Aluminium injection moulds for Soft Plastic Lures and Lead Jigs, so I can prototype some of the concepts rattling around in my head. All Openbuilds parts where possible, 1000x500mm footprint, 0.8kw Water-cooled Spindle?, High Torque Stepper?,Smoothieboard?, I still have no idea. As a newbie to the CNC world, any wisdom would be welcome to take this from just a idea into reality so I can start playing with all this awesome stuff. Thanks in advance

C-Beam C-Beam™ Gantry Plate - XLarge
Page 3 of 4
  1. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    Design@2 v27-03.png
     
    #61 Moag, May 14, 2016
    gwandad likes this.
  2. Joe Santarsiero

    Joe Santarsiero OB addict
    Staff Member Moderator Builder

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    196
    Ahh. I see it. Cool.
     
    #62 Joe Santarsiero, May 14, 2016
  3. Joe Santarsiero

    Joe Santarsiero OB addict
    Staff Member Moderator Builder

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    196
    The location in this pic looks good from a part and programming stand point. That being that you'll be working in the first quadrant. It's not a hard rule though. More a good habit. That said, a lot of CAM programs will allow you to choose where part 0,0,0 is located and generate the code from there.
    From an operational standpoint, you can place your machine home anywhere you like and give it multiple homes(as long as your electronics and control software aren't somehow limiting factors).
    Another secondary machine home to consider is the back left. Use it at the end of a program to have the worktable move towards you for retrieving the part.

    Nice build. Post some vids when done.

    Joe
     
    #63 Joe Santarsiero, May 14, 2016
    GrayUK and Moag like this.
  4. David the swarfer

    David the swarfer OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,435
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    I added an option to SketchUcam for exactly this, to move the tool away from part 0,0 so you can retrieve the parts.
     
    #64 David the swarfer, May 15, 2016
    gwandad, Mark Carew and Joe Santarsiero like this.
  5. John Mueller

    John Mueller New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2015
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    39
    Back to the t-nut issue, just push them into place with a flexible rod and micro magnet epoxied to the end of it. After doing a few like that it is easy enough to work with.

    Otherwise I want one in red or blue! With the extrusion in silver. ;)
     
    #65 John Mueller, May 15, 2016
  6. Rick 2.0

    Rick 2.0 OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    1,551
    Seriously, the t-nuts are really not that big of a deal. Get them in alignment, slap a strip of blue tape over them to hold them in position and then peel it as you slide the connection together.
     
    #66 Rick 2.0, May 15, 2016
    Moag and Joe Santarsiero like this.
  7. TerryOx

    TerryOx Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2016
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    30
    What are your thoughts about using a single high-torque, 345oz/inch NEMA-23, with the two outriggers for stability? NEMA 23 Stepper Motor - High Torque Series

    Isn't that better than two 175 oz-in NEMA 23 motors on the same axis?
     
    #67 TerryOx, May 18, 2016
    Last edited: May 18, 2016
  8. Joe Santarsiero

    Joe Santarsiero OB addict
    Staff Member Moderator Builder

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    196
    Depends on motor characteristics and drivers. You may want to hunt down the torque curves for each motor and run through the math to see if one is more preferable over the other for a given cutting feedrate.
    It's possible that the 175s might be fast and zippy with a long curve, but they may not have the right kick at cutting speed or stall easily. The 345 may not have a high rpm, but have the torque where it's needed. Its curve could drop off so steeply that at high rapid fees rates steps get lost easily. These are just hypothetical.
    In the end it's tough to say. You could have 5 different 175 motors that all act differently. It depends on how they're built and the equipment running them. Good quality drivers can mean the difference between having a motor perform like garbage or gold. If you don't go far into specing the motors then at least invest in some decent electronics to help reduce the chance of having a motor package that doesn't run great.

    Joe
     
    #68 Joe Santarsiero, May 18, 2016
    Moag and GrayUK like this.
  9. John T Miller

    John T Miller New
    Builder

    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    OK, complete newbie here, but ... if the perplex sides were aluminum instead, and mounted to the outside, couldn't you reduce the total number of parts and increase the rigidity of the overall assembly?
     
    #69 John T Miller, May 23, 2016
  10. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    Yes, John it could if not counting how they are mounted and it would also increase the rigidity of the frame in that plane. The main design consideration for using Acrylic sheet (a cheap alternative to polycarbonate) is that you can see what is going on from the side and it is also a fairly rigid material until you hold a hot air gun to it.
     
    #70 Moag, May 23, 2016
  11. Javier Canedo

    Javier Canedo New
    Builder

    Joined:
    May 29, 2016
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hi Moag, great job. Its just the idea I had (but better developed).

    I was planning to buy the basic parts for a 1000mm x 500mm machine and create reinforcement plates, etc. with it.

    Is your Part list updated? Do you have cad files of the reinforcement plates?

    Javi
     
    #71 Javier Canedo, May 31, 2016
    Last edited: May 31, 2016
  12. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    Stay tuned Javi,

    There is a bundle deal in the pipeline based on this design, which I'm working on at the moment ;)
     
    #72 Moag, May 31, 2016
    eddiejr likes this.
  13. chuangatronic

    chuangatronic New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2015
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    1
    I just want to give a word of warning about the z-axis in that configuration. I've been getting a lot of chatter on aluminum when the z-axis is extended to maximum length. I've had no problems on anything softer though. So even though the frame is rigid and the x and y configurations are bulletproof, the z-axis is seems to be the weak link due to the c-beam's deflection behavior at maximum length. Those stiffening channels seem like a good way to help mitigate this problem though, I look forward to seeing the performance of this machine when all is said and done!

    The big caveat is that my x-z gantry only uses wheels at the corners and doesn't have a wrap around ox-style for the x-axis. It may be that my lack of wheels could be compromising the stability of my gantry. Because of that, I switched back to a c-beam machine like configuration with the z-axis bolted straight to the x-axis carriage and a lower gantry height from the table.

    My current cut profile for 6061 T6 hardened is as follows:

    RPM: roughly 16000 (but not fixed due to using bosch colt, no clue how accurate the rpm range actually is since I'm not using a VFD with closed loop control)
    SFM: roughly 500, but it's at the mercy of the colt.
    IPT: for my tools it's recommend to run at 0.0381 mm, I definitely don't run at that since my feed rate is significantly lower.
    MMPM:
    • Rough: 700mm/m, but risk of chattering moderate. I set the stock to leave at .5 mm because of that. I would run it at the calculated 1200mm/m, but the z axis vibration just kills tolerances and makes it hard to estimate stock to leave since the vibration isn't constant. This may have to deal with levelness of my table, I didn't run a surfacing operation to true it up since I all I own is 1/8" tools.
    • Finishing: 380mm/m leaves a pretty nice finish, sandblast and powdercoat effectively cover any flaw. The chips off this feed are still acceptable, haven't had a double cut or chip fusing problem yet.
    Depth of cut: between .2 to .5mm because I'm a chicken, lol. I tend to go with the middle at .35mm
    Tolerance: .41mm or roughly 16 mils total runout

    Hope this helps with anyone trying to work on improved builds.
     
    #73 chuangatronic, Jun 1, 2016
  14. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    Thanks for the heads up @chuangatronic and for sharing your "feeds and speeds" mate.

    Not actually seeing your machine all I can suggest for your chatter problem cutting aluminium is to bring your workpiece up higher with a extra thick spoil board to reduce the length your Z-axis extends if this concerns you and or using a shorter milling bit may help. May I ask what you are using to move your gantries (belts, lead screws) as what I gather chatter is often a result of backlash among other things such as squareness and rigidity of frame, rigidity of mounted work piece, runout of spindle, number of flutes and design of milling bit, climb cutting for example it's complex. It may just be a resonation feedback in your machine, so increasing your feed a tad might take you into a sweet spot for cutting aluminium, slowing it down a little might do the same but risk,rubbing and not cutting. Caveat I'm no expert, but there are some here that may be willing to help if they have all the information at hand;).

    Always looking for better ways of designing stuff so please let me know of any suggestions on how to improve this design.
    Here's a quick render of how I'm planing to set up the ZX gantry, note double Acme nut blocks to adjust out backlash. X axis C-Beam removed because I'm a lazy renderer with lots of others that I need to complete.

    ZX Gantry Assembly v1.png
     
    #74 Moag, Jun 1, 2016
    GrayUK likes this.
  15. chuangatronic

    chuangatronic New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2015
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    1
    @Moag I'm using all lead screws with anti-backlash nuts. You've nailed it with saying to use a thick spoiler board, I've been doing that for all my cuts recently haha.
     
    #75 chuangatronic, Jun 1, 2016
    Moag likes this.
  16. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    Yep, best practice if not needing a large depth of cut;) hey.
     
    #76 Moag, Jun 1, 2016
  17. David the swarfer

    David the swarfer OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,435
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    in the OX build videos Mark mentions keeping Z short and using thick spoilers to keep the work close to the gantry to increase stiffness.
    short things are always stiffer (-:
     
    #77 David the swarfer, Jun 2, 2016
  18. shelbylewis

    shelbylewis New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2016
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    Any info regarding a bundle for this?... I love the design of this machine. Approaching my first build, and this would be perfect for my purposes. Thanks for sharing!
     
    #78 shelbylewis, Jun 13, 2016
    Moag likes this.
  19. Mark Carew

    Mark Carew OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,759
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    @shelbylewis We are working one up. We just want to be sure it meets all the needs and still has room for modification while keeping cost down. So look for a new post coming soon with the C-Beam Machine XLarge version as a Build bundle!
     
    #79 Mark Carew, Jun 13, 2016
    shelbylewis, Lee Pinney, Kyo and 4 others like this.
  20. Javier Canedo

    Javier Canedo New
    Builder

    Joined:
    May 29, 2016
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1
    Great!!! Please, hurry up!!! :ROFL:
     
    #80 Javier Canedo, Jun 14, 2016
    Mark Carew likes this.
  21. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    "Patience Grasshopper"
     
    #81 Moag, Jun 14, 2016
    Lee Pinney, Kyo, GrayUK and 2 others like this.
  22. shelbylewis

    shelbylewis New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2016
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    Sounds great. I look forward to it!
     
    #82 shelbylewis, Jun 21, 2016
    Mark Carew likes this.
  23. Mark Carew

    Mark Carew OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,759
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Just a quick update guys, we are getting a beta Build together now for a clean Build and once that is complete we should be good to go on the C-Beam Machine XLarge! :thumbsup:
     
    #83 Mark Carew, Jul 5, 2016
    Moag, Ronald van Arkel and GrayUK like this.
  24. Bad Sequel

    Bad Sequel Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    32
    *drumroll*
     
    #84 Bad Sequel, Jul 5, 2016
    Moag and Mark Carew like this.
  25. David the swarfer

    David the swarfer OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,435
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    I'll beta that (-:
     
    #85 David the swarfer, Jul 5, 2016
    Moag and Mark Carew like this.
  26. GrayUK

    GrayUK Openbuilds Team Elder
    Staff Member Moderator Builder

    Joined:
    May 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    627
    Great news. :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
     
    #86 GrayUK, Jul 5, 2016
    Moag and Mark Carew like this.
  27. gwandad

    gwandad Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    55
    Prolonged Drum roll!
     
    #87 gwandad, Jul 7, 2016
  28. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    Prolonged Drum roll kind of like those buildup storms at the end of the long dry; you know it's on its way, you just don't know when going to fall, but you know it's going to rain in the future for sure. ;)

    Apologies for the waiting folks.
     
    #88 Moag, Jul 8, 2016
    GrayUK likes this.
  29. gwandad

    gwandad Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    55
    You could launch a Saturn V off it!@
     
    #89 gwandad, Jul 9, 2016
  30. Moag

    Moag Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2016
    Messages:
    183
    Likes Received:
    295
    Ah, but could you land one back on it... Now that's the biggy @gwandad o_O

    Cheers Mate.:D
     
    #90 Moag, Jul 9, 2016
Page 3 of 4

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice