Welcome to Our Community

Some features disabled for guests. Register Today.

C-Beam cnc

Discussion in 'CNC Mills/Routers' started by Kyo, Jun 24, 2016.

  1. Kevon Ritter

    Kevon Ritter Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    294
    Just a follow up. I've been having a ton of weird start up issues; missing keys, out of bounds, no settings menu, and similar. I switch my baud rate to 9600 just for the heck of it, then reconnected. Of course it didn't work, but when I switched back to 115200, the settings popped up. While I actually had access to that window, I switched $10 from 0 to 31 like I saw in the link below. Although it wasn't a direct attempt, I figured it was worth a shot. So far, the program starts every time without issue. I'll check again later today when I get home.
    Error reported on 1.0.9.1 · Issue #50 · gerritv/Grbl-Panel · GitHub
     
  2. KM4_2855

    KM4_2855 New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2016
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    1
    Kyo,

    What is the working area of the finished machine? Trying to see what size material I can cut.

    I apologize if that info is here somewhere but I did not see it.

    Thanks,
     
  3. Kevon Ritter

    Kevon Ritter Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    294
    I measured out to about 345mm square. That would be the absolute limits. Safe (in my opinion) would be 325mm square.
     
    Kyo likes this.
  4. KM4_2855

    KM4_2855 New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2016
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thank you.
     
  5. Gary Bonard

    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2015
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    1
    Does any one know how much to allow for working parts to determine the total X and Y axis c-beam cuts. I'm trying to have a 16"X16" working area?
     
  6. Kevon Ritter

    Kevon Ritter Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    294
    At 500mm, you will get a VERY safe 12" x 12". Adding an extra 100mm to each cut would get you there, but you're going to have a lot of waste material. You would need a 1500mm and a 1000mm. The 1500mm will give you your Y with 300mm worth of waste. The 1000mm will provide for both X and Z. That's the most efficient way to do it, but then you also have to worry about shipping a 1500mm piece of aluminum.

    I think the shop will make custom cuts though. You could go 750mm instead of 600mm. If they can custom cut, then that's better for shipping too.
     
  7. Giarc

    Giarc OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    3,015
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    There is no such thing as v slot waste. There are egg-bots that need to be built with those short pieces. It is that time of year.

    But, to help answer the question, the amount of loss you have on an axis is at least the size of your plates moving back and forth. But, depending on how you mount them, limit switches and the cast angle brackets can cause you to loose distance if you are using them. For example: my X axis is about 845 mm long. When I subtract out the 130 mm X axis plate and the 20 mm cast aluminum angle brackets on each end I get 845-130-20-20= 670 mm. In reality, I get 670 mm. Wow! I must have cut those aluminum plates accurately!:thumbsup: Another thing you have to factor in for overall cutting area, is bit size. You loose the radius of the bit from your total cutting area.

    If I were you, I would buy three 1000mm C beams. use two 1000mm c beams for the Y and use 750 for the x and the leftover 250 for the Z. You would need three 1000mm threaded rods and you can cut one for the X and Z. However, you will loose a bit on the Z because of this since you need enough (about 40mm) for the coupler or pulley.
     
    #337 Giarc, Apr 7, 2017
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2017
    MaryD likes this.
  8. Giarc

    Giarc OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    3,015
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Or, now that I think of it (and my brain is working properly), do what Kevin said and get the 1500 mm and the 1000, 2- 750 mm Y beams and a 750 mm X and a 250(ish) mm Z.
     
  9. Gary Bonard

    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2015
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hi I'm making a new c-beam Ox and I'm also using Chris's tall gantry plates . does anyone know if the Kyo Z have enough reach for the these taller plates?
     
  10. Kevon Ritter

    Kevon Ritter Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    294
    Haha. :ROFL:
    Ya I wasn't referring to travel waste. I meant actual build material waste. But keep in mind that longer lengths also reduce rigidity. You should only have what you need.
     
  11. Kevon Ritter

    Kevon Ritter Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    294
    Worst case scenario is to just make your z axis longer. I built mine a bit differently, but the bottom of the z axis end plate is about 85mm away from the lowest possible point on the table. Now start subtracting your actual spoilerboard or table setup. In my case, I have 20x60 running across the top. Then I have a 1/4" acrylic sheet on top of that. That leaves me with a little under 60mm worth of clearance. I only want to cut aluminum which means that I want cutting stock as close as possible to the gantry c beam so that the twisting loads will be reduced. For that, I'll probably build up my spoiler even more as I only need 12mm worth of clearance.

    The z axis itself, with the extended plate, has about 85mm worth of travel. Keep in mind that the spindle can be mounted at whatever height you want, and that that factor has no effect on travel.

    I hope that helps.
     
  12. wiremonkey

    Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    12
    Hello Kyo, Amazing work! I'm going to build a Sphinx with tall gantry plates and had a few questions if you don't mind.
    1. Will the 2" z axis extension negatively effect aluminum cutting? Or is the design strong enough to take the extra height?
    2. Will I need any extra parts or different parts to build the taller version?
    3. What is the working area of this machine? It looks like about 12" x 16" or so, but I couldn't find anything definitive on the site or in discussions.
    4. I want to mount the z stepper above, no belt, do I need anything other than an extra shaft coupler and stand offs for the z stepper?
    5. I read in the discussions that you determined that one stepper per screw was adequate, so then I'd only need 4 total instead of 7?
    Thank you again for putting all of this together. The amount of work is staggering!
    Cheers,
    Tyler
     
  13. Rosenwasser Benny

    Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hi there,

    First of all congrats at Kyo for the complete build & design, a nice piece of work.
    Also I are thinking about making a CNC like yours, maybe a little bit bigger like 1000mm x 750mm

    I have some questions regarding the plates and the electronics.

    1. I saw you used 6mm aluminum plates for your build.
    On eBay I found someone that sells 3mm plates in stainless steel.
    Openbuilds Kyo Sphinx C-Beam CNC Router Plates Stainless Steel Extra LARGE
    Do you think they are they strong and stiff enough to do woodworking and maybe small aluminum work?

    2. Also on eBay I found Nema23 Stepper Motor 270oz-in 190N-cm 3.0A+Driver DQ542MA 50V 627 for only 230 EURO shipping inkl.
    [EU&DE]4axis Nema23 Stepper Motor 270oz-in 190N-cm 3.0A+Driver DQ542MA 50V 627 | eBay
    What is the big difference between these components and they which I can buy at OpenBuilds or Ooznest?

    Regards, Benny
     
  14. pmyrie

    pmyrie New
    Builder

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2015
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi
    Do you have the 50mm taller plate files for fusion 360
     
  15. Brian Popp

    Brian Popp Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    57
    I've been researching CNCs for a few months now for my first build, and instantly fell in love with the Sphinx. I'm in the final days of tweaking my design while I wait for stuff to float in from China, and had a few questions/concerns. Hopefully someone (especially Kyo) can offer some guidance.
    1. After putting everything together in F360, I noticed that there's at least 170mm of unusable space in the Y axis (possibly more with a larger spindle/mount). Is this consistent with the design? I've noticed that many linear-rails based designs mitigate this problem slightly by adding an offset to the gantry plates. Would this work for an openbuilds design design or would this put too much load on the wheels? See below for a modified gantry that adds 40mm to the Y and Z.

      [​IMG]

    2. I'd like to add homing switches (ideally inductive), but there don't seem to be designated places for them in the build and it doesn't look like many of the builds I've seen have them. Is anyone out there running homing switches on a Sphinx and if so, how/where did you put them.
    Thanks so much for any advice and thanks for the excellent build/community.
     
    Kyo likes this.
  16. wiremonkey

    Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    12
    Hi Brian,
    Good questions. I'd love for Kyo to chime in, but in general, the further back you place your Z load, the more twist torque applied to the X beam. Not sure if I'd do it. And I have the same question regarding the limit switches. It sure would be nice for a neat and convenient way to mount them. I'm probably going to drill and tap a few holes for them on the gantry plates and elsewhere but that's for another day. I too am awaiting a few more electronic components. Also, a mini wheel on the Z shattered shortly after assembly, so it's off awaiting a replacement. Order extra few of everything if you haven't already.
    The footprint of my Sphinx is 740mm wide by 650mm deep. Tyler Sphinx.JPG
    Cheers,
    Tyler
     
    Kyo likes this.
  17. Kevon Ritter

    Kevon Ritter Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    294
    I haven't mounted the z yet, but here is x and y. They will have cases over them to help aesthetically clean it up. The wires are also tucked with the channel inserts.
     

    Attached Files:

    Kyo likes this.
  18. Kyo

    Kyo Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    673
    Likes Received:
    702
    Your builds are looking great guys :thumbsup: That is a nice way of mounting your micro switches Kevin, clean and simple.

    Brian, It is a matter of compromise. I wanted to have the center of mass roughly centered above the wheels to reduce any rotational flex from the weight of the Z-axis / cutting forces. While allowing the endmill to still come completely to the front of the machine. If i was going to have wasted space I wanted it towards the rear of my spoiler board. I do not run limit / end stop switches for a clever way of incorporation inductive type switches into your build check out the design mods Savvas has done on his cnc build.
     
  19. wiremonkey

    Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    12
    Agreed, nice way to mount switches. Copying you.... now.
     
  20. Brian Popp

    Brian Popp Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    57
    Thank you kyo. If you don't think it would be outright disastrous, I think I'll give it a try. Here's a rendering of what it would look like and the difference in the cutting area (the blue line is stock).

    [​IMG]

    Also, I'll rewatch Savvas stuff. I watched his videos a couple weeks ago and loved them, but had forgotten that he used your build as one of his inspirations.
     
    Kyo likes this.
  21. wiremonkey

    Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    12
    Let us know how it goes!
     
  22. Kevon Ritter

    Kevon Ritter Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    294
    I think you'll actually lose a little rigidity since the endmill will have greater torque on the gantry. How much is the question.

    I should say that the torque is being applied differently.
     
  23. Rick 2.0

    Rick 2.0 OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    1,551
    Brian, can you give us a superimposed side view showing the router in relation to the side plate. While your spindle balance appears to have improved, overall the gantry may be a bit back heavy. You might consider adding another top row wheel near the rear of the plate.

    Also, you are overestimating the blue line area. The back blue line should be at the center line of the spindle which only makes for about a 40mm gain.
     
  24. Brian Popp

    Brian Popp Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    57
    Yeah, that blue line is at the center of the spindle, but I think the perspective may have just made the improvement look better than it actually is. Here's a better view that shows both the top and side profile with the modified plates:

    [​IMG]

    I've increased the width to 750mm and the length is roughly stock (550ish). I've considered three modifications to increase rigidity, but I'm not sure if they would actually do anything:
    1. Add a 20x40 vrail underneath the X axis cbeam. I would join it to the cbeam (likely with blind joints), and then modify the plates slightly to accommodate it. This seems like it would have two advantages. First, it would add rigidity to the longer X axis, and two, it would increase the distance between the wheels on the Z gantry which should (i think) reduce torque a little bit.
    2. Add two large wheels to each plate inline with the outer small wheels. I'm 3d printing my wheels in polycarbonate, so cost isn't an issue and it seems like it couldn't hurt.
    3. Finally, I've ordered a 12x12 3/8" plate to use for my side plates. It's only $12 more for the materials and the impact to the design is minimal.
    I'm not an engineer, though, and any assumptions I've made here are just instincts (likely misguided instincts) more than anything else.
     
    #354 Brian Popp, Apr 25, 2017
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2017
    Kyo and Rick 2.0 like this.
  25. Rick 2.0

    Rick 2.0 OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    1,551
    From the side view it looks like you've got even better balance than the original design.
     
  26. Kyo

    Kyo Veteran
    Staff Member Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    673
    Likes Received:
    702
    Looks good Brian, give it a go. That is one of the great things about this site and the designs here. You are able to freely modify and update to suit your needs. Not being locked it by one set standard or lic. I learn more and more with each build my own and others. I look forward to seeing more of your build. :thumbsup:
     
  27. Giarc

    Giarc OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    3,015
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    It looks good, but...now it doesn't utilize the entire cutting surface to the front. Unless, of course, you are using really large diameter cutters.;) If you bumped it back half the distance, the center of the spindle, where the cutter is, will be able to cut (approximately) all the way to the front edge.
     
  28. Giarc

    Giarc OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    3,015
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Although, either way I think you are going to get the max you can out of it without actually shrinking the width of the Y gantry plates. You can also clamp the front of your stock the way you have it now.
     
  29. Brian Popp

    Brian Popp Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    57
    You had me worried there for a minute, but there actually doesn't appear to be much waste in the front (at least with a large router):

    [​IMG]
     
  30. Giarc

    Giarc OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder Resident Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    3,015
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Basically, you loose the width of your Y plates. As long as the bit is cutting between the front and rear edges of these plates, you maximize your cutting area. I like your design. I did the same thing in my build. I may make a dremel mount that fits the front of my spindle mount so I can cut dovetails by mounting the boards vertically on the front of my machine. The dremel would extend over the front edge far enough to do so.
     
    Kyo likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice